The Dark(er) Side to the Baby Teeth Story

What’s our government doing when we’re not looking?

Last week I wrote about participating in a Harvard University study of baby teeth from the St. Louis area. The short version:

In the 1950’s, the United States military tested nuclear devices in the Nevada desert. Prevailing winds blew the fallout east, and some of it landed in St. Louis. A group of scientists decided to study the baby teeth of young children who were born or grew up in the St. Louis area. My mom and dad were among the parents who donated teeth to the study.

After I published the blog post about this, a reader alerted me to a related story of alleged government malfeasance that may have affected my health.

According to CNN,

Throughout the nuclear arms race of the 1950s and 60s, the US military feared an enemy attack using biological warfare, according to online government records.

To prepare, according to the National Institutes of Health, the US Army conducted experiments in 33 locations and cities across the country, including St. Louis, to test how an aerosol biological agent might spread in different environments.

Government records show the Army sprayed zinc cadmium sulfide in these dispersion tests, an inorganic compound composed of zinc, cadmium, and sulfur that glows bright yellow under ultraviolet light.

At the time, the NIH said the compound was thought to be harmless to humans, animals and plants. Today, the Army still maintains the substance used was non-toxic.

Most of the spraying in St. Louis was done around Pruitt-Igoe, a large public housing project. According to some reports, the substance was also sprayed

… in the areas of Clayton, the Faulkner Roads, a Knights of Columbus building on South Grand, and a pond east of the St. Louis Science Center’s Planetarium in Forest Park.

I went to elementary school in the 60’s in a suburb next to Clayton, and spent junior high and high school in Clayton itself. I visited the Planetarium many times — sometimes to learn about planets but more often for the “Laser Zeppelin” and “Laser Pink Floyd” shows.

All indications are that the folks who lived in Pruitt-Igoe got much more of this stuff than I did. But it is entirely possible I breathed at least some of it over the years.

Was the material they sprayed harmful? With tumors having been removed from my right lung and my pancreas, I’ve got more than just academic interest in this question.

The Army still says it was not toxic, but CNN points out:

The NIH recommends further testing to determine the toxicity of zinc cadmium sulfide but classifies cadmium sulfide as a hazardous substance that may cause cancer and damage to internal organs as a result of prolonged or repeated exposure.

According to the NIH, chronic exposure to zinc sulfide can cause anemia, lethargy, a decrease in good cholesterol, damage to the pancreatic and reproductive systems. It can also cause ataxia, an illness where people lose control of muscles in their arms and legs, according to Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.

To make matters worse, there’s a chance the Army was spraying something besides just zinc cadmium sulfide. Journalist Devin Thomas O’Shea, writing in Protean Magazine, reports this

One of the compounds that was sprayed on the public was called “FP2266.” According to the Army documents, FP 2266 was “made by New Jersey Zinc (NJZ) Company and is now made by U.S. Radium Corp.”

FP2266 is a “military nomenclature,” [Dr. Lisa] Martino-Taylor notes, “generally representing a zinc cadmium sulfide mixture which notably does not exclude additives.” Although “FP” might stand for “fluorescent particle” or “fluorescent paint,” the acronym “FP” was also used in similar studies to signify radioactive “fission products” and/or “fallout particles.”

U.S. Radium Corp was infamous for its product Radium 226, a highly radioactive compound that sickened or killed many of the company’s female factory workers, who have made the history books as the cautionary workplace tale of the “Radium Girls.”

Some observers believe, says O’Shea, that FP226 was Radium 226. No definitive proof has surfaced.

When I filled out the Baby Tooth Survey forms earlier this month, this seemed like a cute story. Two weeks later, I’m considerably less amused.

I’m pondering the possibility that I’ve been poisoned by my own government. Twice. That I know of.

Happy Thanksgiving.

.

Intriguing Treatment Study
of the Week

The Hawaii Parkinson Association is conducting a study to determine if a combination of speech therapy and harmonica playing increases the benefit to people with Parkinson’s.

It is open to Hawaii residents only.

According to Hawaii Harmonica Project Director Kevin Lockette, PWP’s with speech difficulty often experience softness of voice, difficulty with articulation, and difficulty with pitch and saliva management. All of these things, says Lockette, can be improved with harmonica playing.

This is a randomized crossover study, which means all participants will get harmonica lessons, but not necessarily at the same time.

They are hoping to start assessments in December, and lessons in January. For more information, contact Kevin at kevin@parkinsonshawaii.com.

.

Bonus for Those Who Read to the Bottom

To salute Cher’s new memoir, in which she accuses Sonny of stealing all her money here are three very different versions of “I Got You, Babe.”

.

.

12 responses to “The Dark(er) Side to the Baby Teeth Story”

  1. mmmeow60 Avatar

    Hey, Phil – I typed a reply about the baby teeth project; not sure if it went through.

    ALSO, I used to have that Tiny Tim record!

    Like

    1. philbernstein Avatar

      I did not see your comment on the baby teeth post, Cat. It is not an “spam“ or “pending,“ so it appears to disappeared into the ether.

      I had not heard tiny Tim’s Rendition of “I Got You, Babe“ until this week. I am still recovering from it.

      Like

  2. mmmeow60 Avatar

    That is terrible about the spraying as well as all the toxins allowed by the government_– it’s so many things….that, food additives that aren’t allowed in Europe, Glyphosphate, the mosquito trucks of the 60s, formaldehyde finishing spray on new clothing! Those things surely add up in our bodies; some are dangerous enough on their own. All we can do is make good choices when we can.

    Your post on the baby teeth project was so interesting — I’ve had memory of that for many years! I used to go to the Science Center a lot (Big BendClayton Rd.), and they must’ve been a drop-off point for teeth, as I got a “I gave my teeth to science” pin! I knew exactly where that pin was for about 60 years — until we moved! Lots of articles out there….seems as though trunks of ground-up teeth were found in bunkers at Lone Elk State Park????

    As always, lots of good thoughts to YOU!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. philbernstein Avatar

      I have no memory at all of the baby teeth study. The email from the organizers came as a complete surprise. I’m sure my parents talked about it at some point but it didn’t stick with me, and now it’s too late to ask them.

      Like

      1. mmmeow60 Avatar

        I never got a letter. Reading your post again, terrible…seems as if a lot of cover-up was going on ??

        Get Outlook for Androidhttps://aka.ms/AAb9ysg ________________________________

        Like

  3. Susan RichWriting (aka BonaClese) Avatar
    Susan RichWriting (aka BonaClese)

    Immensely disturbing. For you and everyone else in those communities. What they didn’t ‘think’ at the time was toxic feels like a lie to me — they were testing it to harm people in the first place. That it took years to show up as cancer or other neurological problems is the kind of long-term thinking the government agencies seldom consider.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Susan RichWriting (aka BonaClese) Avatar
    Susan RichWriting (aka BonaClese)

    Immensely disturbing. For you and everyone else in those communities. What they didn’t ‘think’ at the time was toxic feels like a lie to me — they were testing it to harm people in the first place. That it took years to show up as cancer or other neurological problems is the kind of long-term thinking the government agencies seldom consider.

    Like

    1. shakinstreet.com Avatar

      This is, unfortunately, the kind of thing we only find out decades later. We know (some of) the things they were doing in the 1950’s and 1960s — What are they doing these days?

      Like

  5. catjollyfbfca93c2d Avatar
    catjollyfbfca93c2d

    I’m enjoying your blog. I just wish you would not use the term ‘Parkies’. People with other diseases don’t nickname their disease. These diseases are too serious for cutesy nicknames – in my opinion. I don’t introduce myself as a ‘Parkie’. I say I have Parkinson’s Disease. Serious name for a serious disease.

    Respectfully

    Like

    1. philbernstein Avatar

      I appreciate your comment. I am relatively new to the Parkinson’s world, and “Parkies” is an expression I initially encountered Allison Smith’s “Perky Parkie” blog. I have also heard people in my local Parkinson’s community refer to each other as “Parkies.”

      To be candid, I had no idea anyone had a problem with the expression until your comment. After I received it, I did some online searching and learned that there does not seem to be a consensus— some people use it regularly, and others find it demeaning and offensive.
      Now I need to decide how I feel about the expression. I haven’t settled on an opinion yet. I’ll probably be posting about it soon.

      In all seriousness, thanks for bringing this to my attention.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. catjollyfbfca93c2d Avatar
        catjollyfbfca93c2d

        Phil Thank you for listening and being open. As you think on this nickname, going forward, knowing that many with PD find this term demeaning and offensive, I hope will give you pause.
        Thank you again

        Like

Leave a comment

I’m Phil Bernstein

I was diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease on May 25, 2023. At the time, I was only vaguely aware of Parkinson’s — primarily from articles in People about Michael J. Fox. And I didn’t know anyone with the disease.

Now, I know a lot more about the illness, and I’ve joined the Parkinson’s community in my hometown of Portland, Oregon.

I’ve found that writing helps me think through challenges, and this illness definitely qualifies as a challenge. I’ve started Shakin’ Street to help me think through the various obstacles, tools, and resources that a newly-diagnosed Parkinson’s patient encounters along the way.

I hope some of these posts help you address and tackle your own challenges.

Let’s connect