Squeaky Wheels, Grease, and Parkinson’s: From Cynicism to Action

Last week I attended a talk by Dr. Ray Dorsey, co-author of New York Times best-seller The Parkinson’s Plan. The event was presented by the Brian Grant Foundation.

Dorsey’s book, written with Dr. Michael Okun, takes the position that Parkinson’s is to a large extent caused by environmental factors such as pesticides, cleaning solvents, and other chemicals.

The authors believe individuals can often avoid getting the disease by avoiding those substances — and that we can greatly reduce the number of cases by banning those chemicals.

I came into the talk feeling somewhat cynical about our chances. Congress barely functions.

Is there really any reason to make the effort if nothing will happen?

Dorsey set me straight.

He described a conversation he had with Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R) of West Virginia. Capito, with Senator Chris Murphy (D) of Connecticut, introduced the National Plan to End Parkinson’s Act.

Capito, said Dorsey, doesn’t have a significant personal connection to Parkinson’s — no close family or friends have the disease.

But she heard about it repeatedly from constituents. Some were organized, like the Charleston Parkinson’s Support Group. Some were just people she ran into in the grocery store.

Meanwhile, her Democratic colleagues were also hearing from the people they represent. And national organizations like the Michael J. Fox Foundation were banging the drum in Washington and elsewhere.

The efforts persuaded a bipartisan group of senators and representatives to write the bill and push it across. The final vote wasn’t close. The bill passed 407-9 in the House, and unanimously in the Senate.

Dorsey made a strong case that by combining and amplifying our voices, we can move our representative government toward taking further action.

As a starting point, he urged us to email Lee Zeldin, who runs the United States Environmental Protection Agency, and ask him why the US government hasn’t banned Paraquat yet.

Zeldin’s email address is zeldin.lee@epa.gov.

My email is going out this week. I invite you to join me.

.

Fighting “Ohtani:” Giving My Case a Name

John Wayne referred to his cancer as “The Big C.” Baseball great Kirk Gibson calls his case of Parkinson’s “Parky.”

Giving a serious disease a nickname can open conversations, reduce stigma, and communicate support for others dealing with the same condition.

Chris Anthony, who writes the From Where I Sit blog on Substack, calls his affliction “Phil.” Save your outrage, Shakin’ Street readers: he named it after the great pitcher Phil Niekro, master of the knuckleball.

Even the pitcher doesn’t know where it’s going…

Ever tried to hit a knuckleball? It floats, dives, and refuses to behave — kind of like my right leg on a bad day. You don’t predict it. You don’t power through it. You stay loose, stay balanced, and hope your timing holds up.

Parkinson’s throws those same kinds of pitches — slow-moving but tricky, unpredictable in all the wrong ways. That’s why I go to the gym. Not because I know what Phil’s throwing tomorrow. I go because I don’t.

While I’d have preferred that he’d named his affliction after Hoyt Wilhelm or Wilbur Wood, I can’t argue with his logic — Parkinson’s is a knuckler.

With the 2025 World Series in full swing, I’ve decided my case deserves its own name. I’m calling it “Ohtani.”

Shohei Ohtani may be the best active baseball player on the planet. Three Most Valuable Player Awards, in two different leagues. He’s one of the top hitters in the game, and can pitch a little, too.

If you’re on any of 29 Major League Baseball teams, Ohtani is an incredibly formidable opponent.

He’s a hitter nobody wants to face. But he doesn’t succeed every time. In the first three games of the National League Championship Series, the Milwaukee Brewers held him to 2 hits in 11 at-bats (.182), no home runs and only one run batted in.

Milwaukee had him figured out…right?

Then Game Four happened. Three Ohtani home runs. He also threw six shutout innings as the starting pitcher, striking out ten.

Just when the Brewers thought they’d vanquished the mighty Ohtani, he singlehandedly bounced them from the playoffs.

Those of us with Parkinson’s have a similar challenge. We can do everything right — exercise, clean up our diet, work with our care team to fine-tune the medication, even implant electrodes in our brains.

Doing all that will hold things off for a while. Maybe a long while. But sooner or later, Parkinson’s adjusts.

It’s not hopeless — if we can hold it off long enough, someone’s bound to find a cure. The National Plan to End Parkinson’s Act betters our chances.

But until then, Parkinson’s keeps swinging. Today’s strategy may not work tomorrow.

I’ve named my opponent Ohtani.

Game on.

.

Bonus for Those Who Read to the Bottom

.

South Korea’s Kim Sisters lend their harmonies to the Elvis classic.

.

Just a boy, his dad, a trombone, and an oven.

.

Turns out that with a lot of skill and some electronic thingamajigs, you can play “Dueling Banjos” on an accordian.

6 responses to “Squeaky Wheels, Grease, and Parkinson’s: From Cynicism to Action”

  1. Questioning Solomon’s Wisdom Avatar
    Questioning Solomon’s Wisdom

    wh

    Like

  2. pdxknitterati Avatar

    That was a great presentation by Dr. Dorsey. Definitely gave us a lot to think about.

    That video of the Kim Sisters…the guitarist never moved her fretting hand. I know it takes 3 chords to make a song! That must have been horrifying to try to sing/lip sync with a crashy guitar in the mix.

    Like

    1. shakinstreet.com Avatar

      Nice catch on the Kim Sisters – I had not noticed the guitarist’s left hand.

      Like

  3. jchrisanthony Avatar

    I got a copy of The Parkinson’s Plan on the first day it was available. It’s a great read. The prevalence of disease-causing chemicals in our environment should scare us all to death. The National Plan to End Parkinson’s Act was a significant step, but it was introduced without a funding component — Congress is sneaky like that. The law establishes the NPP to coordinate federal efforts, but it does not specify or authorize a specific funding amount. The legislation requires Congress to specifically appropriate funds for the NPP in future years’ budgets. That means the funding will probably come as part of large omnibus spending bills, and to your point, we’ve all seen how effective Congress is at passing omnibus packages….. Advocacy now switches to funding. That is the hard part.

    Politicians like to take a victory lap when a bill passes, whether or not it has funding.

    Like

    1. shakinstreet.com Avatar

      Perhaps that’s why it passed so overwhelmingly — easy to vote against Parkinson’s when it doesn’t cost any money to do so. I wonder how nine reps convinced themselves to vote “No.”

      Like

  4. jchrisanthony Avatar

    https://www.newsweek.com/republicans-who-voted-against-project-cure-parkinsons-disease-1852614

    9 Republicans in the House voted against the bill. 12 other Republicans abstained and 6 Democrats abstained as well. Who knows why.

    Like

Leave a reply to shakinstreet.com Cancel reply

I’m Phil Bernstein

I was diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease on May 25, 2023. At the time, I was only vaguely aware of Parkinson’s — primarily from articles in People about Michael J. Fox. And I didn’t know anyone with the disease.

Now, I know a lot more about the illness, and I’ve joined the Parkinson’s community in my hometown of Portland, Oregon.

I’ve found that writing helps me think through challenges, and this illness definitely qualifies as a challenge. I’ve started Shakin’ Street to help me think through the various obstacles, tools, and resources that a newly-diagnosed Parkinson’s patient encounters along the way.

I hope some of these posts help you address and tackle your own challenges.

Let’s connect